by Allan Chubb

The View of the Developmental Psychologist

Developmental psychology is a large and complex subject starting with the fertilisation of the ovum and continuing beyond adolescence. Indeed many books have been written on the subject. We shall be concerned here with those aspects which affect consciousness and our own consciousness in particular. Anybody wishing to pursue this subject further would be advised to take a course in developmental psychology or consult the bibliography. Developmental psychology is an interesting and useful subject of particular interest to those concerned with raising children.

We are choosing to begin our study of psychology with development since after that other aspects of the subject will fall into place. As with other aspects of psychology it is useful to understand how the subject has evolved. During the Victorian era, and indeed before that, children were usually regarded as little adults and it was said that ‘The child is father of the man’. Bringing up children was based on the idea that it was the parent and teachers of various kinds who formed the mind of the child and hence the adult. I use the term ’various teachers’ in the widest possible sense. This sometimes led to some very oppressive and authoritarian schools which did not recognise children’s natural style of learning. Today it is recognised that children begin life in a very different way from the way adults think and behave. 

Piaget’s Work

The first substantial challenge to this idea came from the Swiss psychologist, Piaget, who was a very astute observer of infants and children. He was particularly interested in what is called cognitive development, that is the way that a child’s view and interaction with the world developed, starting with the newborn baby. This was no mean undertaking and it was largely uncharted territory. Piaget’s own children were the focus of much of his attention and this enabled him to spend much time seeing how their minds developed. He was very impressed by the way in which children and infants were active in their own development. This set a new trend in the understanding of child development with a consequential effect on education which did much to make schools pleasanter places to be.

Piaget was a trail blazer and since he was breaking new ground in what turned out to be a very large subject, it is not surprising that some aspects of his work have come in for criticism later. In Piaget’s day it was considered that cognitive, emotional and social development could be considered separately. It is now realised that this is not the case and that all these aspects are interrelated. If a child is unhappy it will detrimentally affect their learning, while social problems, such as bullying, are obvious things which can make a child unhappy. The modern approach is therefore to consider development as an interrelated process. Other criticisms have followed but before we consider these it is instructive to pursue our evolutionary and historical approach to understand how progress was first made.

Piaget began his ideas from the stage of the newborn baby. We have seen the views of the reductionists and their emphasis on structure and physiology. Work on these lines still continues and often supplements the work of the behavioural psychologist. However, most of the early work was done by studying behaviour during development. From the point of fertilisation the baby develops in the womb from egg to zygote to embryo and thence to the foetus before the stage of birth. The first recognised signs of consciousness occur in the foetus when movement is detected and about this stage the ear is sufficiently developed to recognise the mother’s voice. It is affected by the mother’s voice and prolonged periods of stress in the mother seem to affect the foetus at this stage. Substance abuse can also affect the conscious state of the foetus and research shows that some substances can lead to attention deficit disorder later in life. Much has been written about birth trauma, but we all have to go through it unless born by caesarian section. Gynaecologists now believe that evolution has prepared us for this event.

Piaget’s work begins at the stage of the neonate, or new born, baby. It seems that the neonate is equipped with a set of reflexes such as those for breathing, sucking and grasping, and an appetite or tendency to do certain things. As a result, from a very early stage, the baby begins to interact with the mother and the environment. The neonate’s vision is rather hazy at this stage but improves over the first month of life. With improving vision comes recognition of faces, of which the mother’s comes to play a predominant role, as does her voice. At first the neonate’s concerns are largely with surviving, such as feeding, sleeping and excreting. With time the initial reflexes enable the baby to gain greater control over movement until most of the reflexes are replaced by conscious control. Piaget considered this to be the first stage of what he called the sensory motor development which is the development of the child to approximately 24 months. This period must rate as the stage at which the most dramatic transformation takes place. In ways appropriate to the stage of development the infant is exploring what it can do. At first it explores its own body, and sexual awareness of a sort develops at a  remarkably early stage, as Freud pointed out. It is a stage of repetition, at first with its own body, and then with objects in the environment.

As the child learns to move around we see the early stages of intentionality, usually at about 8 to 12 months of age when the child is beginning to solve simple problems. By 18 months the infant is combining new skills to find ways to solve more difficult problems. Language is developing at this stage, from the first word to combinations of words. This enables a greater level of interaction with parents, siblings and some adults such as grandparents who often play with them. Children learn through play and one game which is played with infants is hiding an object of some interest to them. This shows various stages of understanding over a period of time. A very young child will ignore an object when it is hidden, but with time will find the object, first when it is partially hidden and later when hidden completely. The infant begins to use words to think about things such as where the hidden object is, not just speaking words but beginning to internalise them and thinking takes on a verbal form. By 2 years speech is usually well under way and most parents are impressed by what is called the ‘naming explosion’ when the infant learns many new names. Some of the problems solved at this stage are quite practical such as using a stick to reach for an object which would otherwise be out of reach.

Imitation of parents and of siblings plays a large part in the infant’s learning. The repertoire of behaviour is increasing rapidly all the time, some based on imitation but some are new combinations. The difficulty of tasks is observed to increase with the increase of experience. Advances in mobility help to extend what infants can reach, observe and handle. Mobility itself develops gradually from crawling to the first stumbling steps. The nervous system gradually learns to integrate the necessary skills but this takes time and develops in stages. Piaget demonstrated once and for all that in reaching the 2 year old stage we must consider it as a developmental process. 2 year olds do not come ready made. Indeed, Piaget pointed out that the process does not stop here and there are at least 2 more stages to go through.

Anybody familiar with young children knows that children are quite inventive and inquisitive. They are active in their own learning and enjoy games such as peekaboo, when an adult hides their face with their hands for a while and then removes their hands. Making learning fun is a great aid to progress.

Piaget’s sensory motor period has come in for some criticism. Some developmental psychologists believe that the new born baby enters the world with a greater intuitive understanding of what materials are like, such as hard and soft objects, liquid and solids and animate and inanimate objects. They don’t believe that this knowledge has to be gained through exploration in the early sensory motor stage. Other developmental psychologists think that the reality is somewhere between the view of Piaget and Neo-nativism psychologists. The Neo-nativists also think that children have a better grasp of the permanence of objects than Piaget believed and that his tests were too complex for the age of the child. They also think that a propensity for some of these skills, such as symbolic thinking, is built in. For example, they think that from an early age children recognise the number of objects present and are aware if one goes missing, although initially only with small numbers. 

As we have already noted emotional, cognitive and social development are all integrated. However, cognitive development has come in for special consideration in part because of Piaget’s initial work but also because these skills are fundamental to social development. Emotional developments progress in parallel. As one psychologist notes, every thought process has an emotional valency such as whether we like that or not. Needless to say, emotional valency varies a lot in intensity and we sometimes remember both pleasant and unpleasant things, even from youth.

These early stages form the foundation of our development, but then Piaget recognised a second phase, approximately from 2 to 7 years of age, the Pre-operational stage. Of course one stage merges into another and there is considerable variation between individuals. However, Piaget’s Pre-operational phase is a good place to start looking at further development.

During this period children are widening their social contacts, particularly with other children. It is also a period when most children in developed countries begin school. At first children tend to see everything from their own point of view. Piaget described this as egocentric thinking, although other psychologists believe that children of this age may have some grasp of how others think. Certainly it is a stage when children meet other children and encounter opposition occasionally. Through these encounters they gradually learn about other’s thinking, a process which continues even to adulthood.

Piaget thought that at this stage children tend to attribute animistic explanations to inanimate objects. They may say, when bumping into a chair, “The chair hit me”, or “The wind blows to make me cold”, but not all psychologists think that animistic thinking is as prevalent at this age. This aspect of development runs into Piaget’s claim that these children tend not to think logically. Others disagree, pointing out that a fair test must take into account the age and stage of development of the child. Certainly children become more logical as they get older. Hand in hand with this development goes the emergence of symbolic thinking. Their minds are able to retain memories from the past and use them. These may be things they have seen, heard or touched. It all adds to their creativity.

Piaget is well known for his studies of whether children can reason about conservation, as when water is poured from a tall container into a squat container. If these are made of glass the child can see the level of liquid and, by Piaget’s next developmental stage, that is the Concrete-operational stage, they have no trouble in understanding that the water in both containers is the same amount.

Or perhaps a ball of plasticine is changed into different shapes. Here also the child now understands that the amount of plasticine has not changed. As in other cases other psychologists think that it is not so simple as this, and that it depends on the complexity of the task. Similarly children at the Concrete-operational stage are able to think about situations not present, but again with younger children their performance depends upon the level of complexity.

Even children’s sense of humour develops as they get older. younger children tend to see things as funny when the situations are incongruous. The sophistication of things they laugh about increases with age.

By the Concrete-operational age children become more logical, probably as the result of greater experience, and they are beginning to arrange things in order, such as children in a class arranging themselves in order of height. Children of this age are extending their capabilities by arranging things both mentally and physically.

Parents and teachers have noted that children of this age like to have behavioural guide lines. As we progress to Piaget’s last stage of development, the Formal-operational stage, roughly from 11 to 12 years of age, parents become all too aware that children are beginning to assert their own individuality and are asking for more independence. They tend to be more critical of the status quo and question the wisdom of the older generation. All this arises because adolescents are increasingly thinking about how things might be rather than dwelling on how things are. This can lead to scientific investigation and the study of academic subjects.

This stage also sees the onset of puberty and all the adjustments which this requires. In a sense the adolescent becomes somewhat egocentric, by thinking that they are the centre of attention, particularly in the way that they look and behave. The onset of hormonal changes can make emotional life turbulent for them, but at the intellectual level maturation of the brain is taking place, particularly in the myelination of certain pathways in the brain. This development enables more efficient logical thinking. Almost everybody achieves the Formal-operational stage to some extent and Piaget claimed it was the final stage of development continuing into adulthood. Whether there may be a stage beyond the Formal-operational stage is a question you may be able to decide when reading the end of the book.

Vygotsky’s Work

Piaget tend to emphasise the individual as the main agent in their development but a challenge to this position came from his contemporary, the Russian developmental psychologist, Vygotsky. While Vygotsky recognised that the individual was an active agent in their own development he stressed the special role which parents and teachers play. Even older siblings often seem to realise that they must simplify tasks for their younger brothers and sisters.

This is something which Vygotsky described as scaffolding. Teachers become good at this, starting with a very simple task and as the child masters this the next is made a little more difficult. The process is continued gradually increasing in difficulty. A good example is the way in which children are taught arithmetic such as addition and subtraction, starting with recognition of patterns of dots representing different numbers, then progressing by stages to written examples. Vygotsky also emphasised the importance of crucial stages, such as learning multiplication tables, which extend the child’s capabilities and confidence. He was also instrumental in pointing out the influence of different cultures on the way children learn.  The difference in learning between literate and non literate cultures is a good example. This is what Vygotsky referred to as ‘viewing through the cultural lens’. Although some societies, such as bushmen, have a culture not requiring reading in the formal sense, in many cultures the ability to read leads to greater confidence and illiteracy is a cause of great inferiority. Reading and writing are tasks where scaffolding plays an important part for most children.

Vygotsky also differed from Piaget in his interpretation of the way that young children often talk to themselves. Piaget thought that this was egocentric speech of little value and thus becomes eventually superseded. Vygotsky, however, thought that it performed a useful role  being a developmental stage towards internalising speech and formed the basis of thinking. Psychologists now tend to think that Vygotsky was right on this point.

Influence of Media and Technology

As we have already mentioned Vygotsky pointed out the role of adults in passing on to the younger generation the ways of their  culture. In developed societies this has been complicated by the interaction between the individual and technology. Most people are aware of the advantages and dangers of computers, television and mobile phones. Radio, television and computers inform, entertain and educate us. Our emotions can become involved through these media. We can be inspired, depressed, frightened and aroused. Of concern to psychologists is the effect that watching violence can have on us. Not all individuals are equally affected, boys are on the whole more affected than girls and some  are more affected than others. Here imitation is the concern of the psychologist. Another concern of exposure to violence is that it seems to make such occurrences less worrying to the individual, a process known as desensitisation. Pornography has also become a cause for concern, particularly in the way that it can influence individuals. An image on the screen may only be a picture, still or moving, but it has the power to set off trains of thought and emotions. Clearly although the media have great potential for good the dangers are not to be underestimated.

It is not only exposure to the media which now influences development but also interaction with technology that has an affect. We are both influenced by technology and try to influence it. For example, our homes influence us and these are the product of technology. We in turn set out to influence how they are arranged and the activities which we do there. Particular mention should be made of transport. This has changed the lives of us all. Many children travel to places they would not otherwise see and meet people they would not otherwise meet. Clearly technology affects our development and increases our capabilities in many ways. However, whether we live in an advanced technological society or not we share our basic psychological development as shown when we look through the cultural lens.