by Allan Chubb

Before We Start

“There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy”. So wrote William Shakespeare in his play, Hamlet.

We are only intelligent apes and so have the limitations imposed by our ancestry. Psychologists are only too aware of these limitations. In practice, if it is pointed out to someone that we are all limited, most people understand and agree. However, if we observe for a while, it is usually not long before they voice a definitive opinion on some subject without recognising their own limitations.

Opinions often vary and our individual backgrounds play an important role in this respect. The thinking of Plato in ‘Republic’ reveals the influence of his aristocratic background. Not all people would necessarily agree with his thinking. Years later, Nietzsche (1844-1906) reacted against his Lutheran background and put forward the philosophy that the will to win is all important, a philosophy which we often see embodied in society today. It often leads to the ‘might is right’ way of thinking. Clearly even at the basic level of thinking our backgrounds lead us to different viewpoints. Not only our thinking varies but even our senses put limitations upon us.

Limitations of the Senses

We will start with sight since man is predominantly a visual animal. It must be said that Darwin had some difficulty in coming to terms with the relative perfection of the human eye and his understanding that it must have evolved. He concluded that there must have been intermediate stages, though some of these are now difficult to trace. However, he did observe that no organ is ever perfected but is only developed to a level which enables it to cope with the present situation. So let us consider the ways in which the eyes are limited.

To start with we only look in one direction at any one time and therefore only see what is going on in front of our eyes at that time. Even collectively people cannot observe everything, not even with surveillance systems. Further, evolution has adapted our eyes in such a way that we observe the world at a certain level of magnification. This is generally known as the classical level. However with the passage of time instruments such as the telescope and the microscope have been invented, which have greatly extended our understanding of the world around us and indeed the universe. The microscope was instrumental in revealing the cellular nature of living things and the world of bacteria. The electron microscope further revealed the world of viruses. Great achievements as these have been, the instruments can only view a limited field at one time. They do not plug into the world around us in the way that we observe things at the classical level.

There are many subtleties to the human eye. The brain interprets what the eyes see and since the visual field is usually flooded with all kinds of information at any one time the brain has evolved a complex system of attention known as the schemata. We shall return to the subject of the schemata in the section on psychology for a detailed study. Some practical examples from life will show us how subtle the system of attention is. While a child may be captivated by the observation of a flower or some animal, perhaps a pet, other people can find that more abstract things can often occupy the mind. The story of a philosophy professor wandering in a formal park is instructive in such cases. The professor was so lost in his thoughts that he did not notice the ‘Keep off the Grass’ notice and began to wander across the grass. When the park keeper saw him he shouted after him “Who do you think you are and where do you think you are going?” The professor, still lost in thought said “If only I knew the answers to those questions”. It is an amusing story but we should observe that although the professor was lost in his thoughts he was also aware at the same time of the general direction in which he was walking and that someone had spoken to him. Even with his concentration turned inwards his mind was also recording other aspects of his surroundings. This example reminds us how the different modalities are integrated. Most of the time sight and hearing are integrated, as is muscular feedback when we are moving. A person walking along a street may at the same time be aware of a bird singing in a tree and see the bird.

Returning to sensory perception, it is possible to delude our senses. Some people are interested in optical illusions although common experiences of modern life illustrate this. 3D images produced on flat surfaces by vertical scanning techniques are examples, as are holographic images. In these cases we see 3D images which are not there in reality. The illusion of movement is created on the television and film screen and we even have 3D versions of moving pictures. At the same time, sound projected in stereo can further add to the illusion by making the sound appear to come from some point in the projected image. If a car moves across the screen and disappears into the distance the sound can be made to seem to come from the moving car. When a car or plane comes towards you and then recedes into the distance, the pitch of the engine varies, becoming louder and higher pitched as it approaches and lower pitched and quieter as it recedes into the distance. All this can be reproduced by modern communications technology, to make the illusion complete. We all use mirrors which seem to create images behind them, and much fun can be had in rooms where there are mirrors which deliberately distort the image. However, you may argue that this is part of the wonder of the human mind. The film ‘The Matrix’ takes the deluding of the mind to the logical conclusion by subjecting an individual to complete virtual reality.

Even feelings of spatial awareness can be deluded. There is a party game where a person is blindfolded and asked to stand on a board while two other people hold the board and a third person rests their hands on the shoulders of the blindfolded person. The third person presses down on the shoulders while the two persons holding the board slowly raise it about 3 inches above the ground. Then the blindfolded person is asked to jump off the board and onto the floor. To the blindfolded person the illusion is that at that point they think they are several feet above the floor. After the jump they are surprised to find that the board was only 3 inches off the ground, as is clear not only from the jump but also when the blindfold is removed.

Being blindfolded reminds us of the difficulties we experience when trying to find our way in the dark. Blind people, of course, have to cope with this all the time but most of us find the experience difficult. Even limited vision can prove difficult as anyone who has had to find their way in very foggy conditions would realise. Clear vision is extremely important to us.

Some of the anomalies of human experience are due to our anatomy and physiology. Young children sometimes play the game of spinning round fairly rapidly to make themselves feel giddy. It is a peculiar fact that this experience can have this effect which is due to the physiology of the inner ear. None of our senses are perfected and there are situations in which the senses limitations become obvious.

Limitations of the Brain

The human mind is able to think not just about perceptions but about concepts, but even here we find limitations. Physicists still grapple with the nature of gravity, while quantum theorists, although accepting quantum weirdness as an everyday reality, find it difficult to get their heads round it. It does not make sense in terms of classical experience. We shall be looking at this in the chapter on physics and quantum theory. Philosophers have the age old problem of how the mind and body are connected, that is, the epistemic gap problem. We shall return to this philosophical problem at the end of the book.

Clearly the human mind is limited, not least by time and mental capacity. We can only take in so much information at one time and we all have a limited life span. Wherever we are our minds are bombarded with a lot of information. With regard to attention the mind is constantly having to make choices. While concentrating on one thing you cannot be concentrating on something else. Even Einstein, with his mental faculties, came up against this kind of limitation. He spent so much of his time concentrating on physics that his personal life suffered. By his own admission he said that his personal life was a disaster. The social situations in which we live today can be very complex and some people have better social skills than others and are better at navigating these situations. The Greeks had the idea of the balanced person but if you concentrate to an excess on one area you cannot be developing others. This, of course, refers mainly to our more rational pursuits, but emotions, particularly strong emotions, can cloud the mind influencing decisions. Anger, fear, and many other emotions can affect our thinking and it is often difficult to completely understand how other people feel. We all differ genetically and as Jung pointed out, some people are extroverts and some are introverts. These temperamental factors also limit and influence our decisions.

Psychologists are only too aware of all these influences which sometimes cause difficulties. Many of the patients referred to psychologists are suffering from mental disturbances but medical science also encounters a number of special cases such as autism, for example.

Limitations of Geography and Culture

So much is known today and there are so many different languages spoken in the world that one individual cannot hope to cover all that knowledge in depth, or learn to speak more than a certain number of languages. Languages are the key to understanding different cultures, their traditions and literature. Contact with different cultures, even more advanced ones, shows that there are differences in the way they think. Sometimes this produces a rich cross fertilisation of ideas but at other times people seem to be in a state of mutual incomprehension. Apart from political and religious differences cultures vary in their child rearing practices. While oriental families tend to emphasise dependence within the family, many western countries encourage independence. Then there are different ideas about education and other areas where this is the case.

Television and telecommunications have, in a sense, made the world a smaller place, but even with television you can only see what the camera can record at that time, and you can only be physically in one geographical location at one time.

The influences of our upbringing and the traditions we have inherited can play a large part in colouring our views. It is interesting to note that whether a person believes that there is a God or not can have a large affect on their outlook. Today we talk about different world views. Intelligence also comes into the picture but even the most able people are limited in some ways.

The Factor of Technology

This subject is dealt with in a specific chapter. However, at this point it is instructive to reflect on how the technical developments of the last two centuries have changed the way we think and our ability to solve many problems, both technical and daily occurrences. It could be air travel, photography, telecommunications or extending our capabilities with computers, but there are other inventions, such as lasers, which have also changed our capabilities and thus our thinking.

The Effect of Specialisation

As we have said, the present breadth and depth of knowledge has led to the situation where our education system requires us to make choices and specialise to some extent. The range of educational courses and apprenticeships is vast. A moment’s reflection will reveal that different training, such as engineering or philosophy, can often influence those involved as to the relative merits of different world views and lead to varied conclusions when decisions have to be made. In practical terms, when there is a housing shortage there are conflicting views on how far the ecology of the environment is important and how far the need for housing should be met. In the USA conservation concerns versus use of land for prospecting or agriculture is a big issue. These are two obvious areas for disagreement but specialisation does lead to different viewpoints. Since the range and depth of subjects is so great today, the best that can be achieved is to have a grasp of as many subjects as possible. However, even here it will be clear that there are limits.

Indeed to err is human, we all make mistakes at some time and it is not only as individuals that this is true. For example, as scientists have warned, our failure to anticipate the effects and take action to avert the climate crisis is putting the entire ecosystem at risk. A reduced ecosystem and increasing population will make it difficult to feed everybody.

Obviously this is a complex subject and one that we are not completely able to grasp. However, some time spent considering peoples limitations should be enough to convince us that even the most able human beings are limited in some ways. Man is limited socially and intellectually both individually and collectively. We will not concern ourselves with this in the body of the book, instead concentrating on what, by human standards, are remarkable achievements. However, in the course of the book the perceptive reader will will notice areas which show man’s limitations and at the end we shall return to this topic.